This study compared the
effects of long, slow, distance training (LSD) with high-intensity interval training
(HIIT) in rowers. Nineteen well-trained rowers performed three tests
before and after an eight-week training intervention: 1) 2000 m time trial; 2)
seven-stage incremental step test to determine maximum oxygen uptake (
O2max),
power output at
O2max (W
O2max),
peak power output (PPO), rowing economy and blood lactate indices;
and 3) seven-stroke power-output test to determine maximal power output (Wmax) and force (Fmax). After baseline
testing, participants were randomly assigned either to a HIIT or LSD group. The
LSD comprised ten weekly aerobic sessions. The HIIT also comprised ten, weekly
sessions: eight aerobic and two HIIT. The HIIT sessions comprised 6-8 x 2.5
minute intervals at 100% PPO with recovery time based on heart rate (HR)
returning to 70% HRmax. Results demonstrated that the HIIT produced greater
improvement in 2000 m time trial performance than the LSD (effect size (ES) =
0.25). Moreover, the HIIT produced greater improvements in
O2max
(P = 0.035, ES
= 0.95) and power output at
lactate threshold (WLT) (P = 0.008, ES =
1.15). Eight weeks of HIIT
performed at 100% PPO is more effective than LSD in improving performance and
aerobic characteristics in well-trained rowers.