Binding Sites
Humans
Models, Molecular
Molecular Docking Simulation
Protein Structure, Tertiary
Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha
Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor beta/*chemistry/metabolism
Sequence Alignment
Sequence Analysis, Protein
Signal Transduction
Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRalpha) interacts with PDGFs A, B, C and AB, while PDGFRbeta binds to PDGFs B and D, thus suggesting that PDGFRalpha is more promiscuous than PDGFRbeta. The structural analysis of PDGFRalpha-PDGFA and PDGFRalpha-PDGFB complexes and a molecular explanation for the promiscuity of PDGFRalpha and the specificity of PDGFRbeta remain unclear. In the present study, we modeled the three extracellular domains of PDGFRalpha using a previous crystallographic structure of PDGFRbeta as a template. Additionally, we analyzed the interacting residues of PDGFRalpha-PDGFA and PDGFRalpha-PDGFB complexes using docking simulations. The validation of the resulting complexes was evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations. Structural analysis revealed that changes of non-aromatic amino acids in PDGFRalpha to aromatic amino acids in PDGFRbeta (I139F, P267F and N204Y) may be involved in the promiscuity of PDGFRalpha. Indeed, substitution of amino acids with few probabilities of rotamer changes in PDGFRbeta (M133A, N163E and N179S) and energy stability due to the formation of hydrogen bond in PDGFRbeta could explain the specificity of PDGFRbeta. These results may be used as an input for a better and more specific drug and peptide design targeting diseases related with the malfunction of PDGFs and PDGFRalpha such as cancer and atherosclerosis.Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRalpha) interacts with PDGFs A, B, C and AB, while PDGFRbeta binds to PDGFs B and D, thus suggesting that PDGFRalpha is more promiscuous than PDGFRbeta. The structural analysis of PDGFRalpha-PDGFA and PDGFRalpha-PDGFB complexes and a molecular explanation for the promiscuity of PDGFRalpha and the specificity of PDGFRbeta remain unclear. In the present study, we modeled the three extracellular domains of PDGFRalpha using a previous crystallographic structure of PDGFRbeta as a template. Additionally, we analyzed the interacting residues of PDGFRalpha-PDGFA and PDGFRalpha-PDGFB complexes using docking simulations. The validation of the resulting complexes was evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations. Structural analysis revealed that changes of non-aromatic amino acids in PDGFRalpha to aromatic amino acids in PDGFRbeta (I139F, P267F and N204Y) may be involved in the promiscuity of PDGFRalpha. Indeed, substitution of amino acids with few probabilities of rotamer changes in PDGFRbeta (M133A, N163E and N179S) and energy stability due to the formation of hydrogen bond in PDGFRbeta could explain the specificity of PDGFRbeta. These results may be used as an input for a better and more specific drug and peptide design targeting diseases related with the malfunction of PDGFs and PDGFRalpha such as cancer and atherosclerosis.