Bulls used in artificial insemination programmes worldwide undergo quality control checks, which are typically based on the evaluation of sperm motility and morphology. Despite this, some bulls can have lower than expected field fertility and the reasons for this remain to be elucidated. Here we hypothesised that sperm from bulls of varying fertility will differ in their ability to undergo capacitation-related events including an increase in membrane fluidity, protein tyrosine phosphorylation, hyperactivation and the acrosome reaction. Firstly, we used frozen-thawed semen from 10 high-fertility (HF) and 10 low-fertility (LF) bulls, and subjected them to in vitro capacitating conditions, following which sperm viability, membrane fluidity, acrosome integrity and protein tyrosine phosphorylation were assessed using flow cytometry. We then assessed the ability of sperm to undergo hyperactivation (induced using caffeine) utilising computer-assisted sperm analysis, and the acrosome reaction (induced using calcium iono-phore) using flow cytometry. When sperm were incubated in capacitating conditions, a higher per-centage of viable sperm from HF bulls exhibited high membrane fluidity when compared to LF bulls (8.8 +/- 0.8% and 5.8 +/- 1.2%, respectively; mean +/- standard error; P < 0.05). There was no difference between fertility groups in the percentage of acrosome-reacted sperm following the incubation in in vitro capacitating conditions or following the induction of the acrosome reaction using calcium ionophore. However, more sperm from HF bulls became hyperactive in response to caffeine stimulation than sperm from LF bulls (21.6 +/- 2.5% versus 14.1 +/- 2.4%, respectively; mean +/- standard error; P < 0.05). Taken together, sperm from LF bulls had an impaired ability to undergo membrane remodulation and to hyperactivate when induced in vitro. These are key events in the journey of sperm along the female reproductive tract and in the interaction with the oocyte and thus could explain the lower field fertility exhibited by some bulls.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.